In the intricate tapestry of international relations, the theories of realism and neorealism stand as pillars that elucidate the dynamics of power, security, and survival among states. Applying these venerable theories to Liu Cixin’s science fiction masterpiece, “The Three-Body Problem,” opens a unique vantage point from which to examine the interstellar conflict between humanity and the alien Trisolarans and the terrestrial geopolitical tensions that define relations among nations such as China, Russia, and the United States. This essay embarks on a journey through the realms of realism and neorealism, weaving their principles into the fabric of Liu’s narrative to uncover the deeper implications for global security, technological advancement, and the ethical quandaries that pervade both the novel and our contemporary world, all the while maintaining a delicate balance to avoid significant spoilers.

Realism and the Nature of the Conflict

In the intricate narrative of Liu Cixin’s “The Three-Body Problem”, the survival instinct of civilizations serves as a core drive, echoing the realist perspective deeply embedded in international relations theory. Realism, with its roots in the works of Thucydides and further developed by scholars such as Hans Morgenthau, posits that the primary motivation of states—or in this narrative, civilizations—is survival in an anarchic world. This is vividly portrayed in the existential threat humanity faces from the Trisolarans and vice versa, where survival dictates actions and alliances (Morgenthau, 1948). The power struggle between humans and Trisolarans reflects the timeless realist theme of the pursuit of power to ensure security. Just as realism suggests that states are principal actors in an endless quest for power, “The Three-Body Problem” extends this quest to interstellar levels, illustrating the universal applicability of Morgenthau’s principles.

Neorealism and the International System

Kenneth Waltz’s neorealism offers a structural explanation for the behavior of states, emphasizing the anarchic nature of the international system which compels states to rely on self-help mechanisms for survival (Waltz, 1979). This lens is particularly apt for understanding the cosmic anarchy in “The Three-Body Problem”, where the absence of a cosmic authority forces Earth and Trisolaris into a precarious balance of power. The novel intricately showcases how this interstellar anarchy precipitates a security dilemma, a concept Waltz elaborated on, highlighting the tragic cycle of mutual suspicion and armament that escalates tensions rather than securing peace. On Earth, the narrative mirrors neorealism’s balance of power theory, as nations realign their strategies and alliances in response to the Trisolaran threat. This situation is a textbook example of Waltz’s assertion that the structure of the international system compels states to act in certain ways, irrespective of their internal politics or leaders’ desires.

Application to Earth’s Nations

The geopolitical dynamics among China, Russia, and the United States within the novel provide a fertile ground for applying realism and neorealism. The strategic maneuvers of these nations, driven by the imperative to survive and maintain power, encapsulate the realist narrative where international relations are a zero-sum game. The pragmatic considerations of power, as detailed by Morgenthau, and the structural constraints emphasized by Waltz, come to the fore as these nations navigate the new reality posed by the extraterrestrial challenge. Neorealism’s focus on the balance of power and alliance formations can elucidate how the Earthly nations might temporarily set aside historical grievances to counterbalance the Trisolaran threat. Yet, as Waltz might argue, such alliances are inherently unstable, predicated on the shifting sands of power dynamics rather than enduring trust or shared values.

Strategic Culture and Ideological Influences

While realism and neorealism predominantly focus on power and structure, the strategic cultures and ideological underpinnings of human and Trisolaran societies offer additional layers of complexity to their interactions. The strategic decisions made by both civilizations are not merely responses to structural imperatives but are also shaped by historical experiences, societal values, and political ideologies. This intersection of structure and culture in shaping behavior is a nod to the broader debate in international relations about the role of ideational factors, a discussion that scholars like constructivist Alexander Wendt have contributed significantly to, arguing that “anarchy is what states make of it” (Wendt, 1992), suggesting that the perceptions and interpretations of the actors play a crucial role in determining their actions.

Ethical Considerations and Realist Pragmatism

The ethical dilemmas and moral questions that permeate “The Three-Body Problem” can be viewed through the lens of realist pragmatism, where moral considerations often yield to the exigencies of survival and power. Realism, with its focus on pragmatic decision-making in the face of security dilemmas, provides a framework for analyzing the controversial choices made by characters in the novel. This approach allows for a nuanced exploration of the ethical landscapes navigated by both humans and Trisolarans, underscoring the perennial tension between ethical imperatives and survival instincts in the anarchic international system.

Implications for Global Security

The exploration of “The Three-Body Problem” through the lenses of realism and neorealism enriches our understanding of the novel’s thematic depth and offers pertinent insights into the realm of global security. The strategic interactions between humanity and the Trisolarans, as well as among Earth’s own nations, underscore a crucial lesson for global security: the importance of acknowledging the anarchic nature of the international system and the perpetual quest for power and survival that it engenders. This acknowledgment is foundational to addressing contemporary security challenges, suggesting that cooperation, while difficult, is not impossible and requires a nuanced understanding of power dynamics, strategic interests, and the potential for security dilemmas.

The potential for a common threat, such as that posed by the Trisolarans in the novel, to unify disparate nations echoes the real-world need for a collaborative approach to transnational threats, including climate change, terrorism, and pandemics. Realism and neorealism remind us of the inherent challenges in fostering global cooperation due to the anarchic system, yet they also highlight the potential for state actors to transcend these limitations through strategic alliances and diplomatic engagements. This balance between competition and cooperation is delicate, requiring a continuous negotiation of interests and power dynamics. Moreover, the narrative invites reflection on the impact of technological advancements on global security. The novel’s portrayal of human and Trisolaran technologies suggests that technological superiority can significantly alter the balance of power, a notion that resonates with current discussions on cyber warfare, artificial intelligence, and space militarization. As states navigate this evolving security landscape, the principles of realism and neorealism offer valuable insights into the strategic calculations that govern the adoption and regulation of emerging technologies.

“The Three-Body Problem” serves as a metaphorical reminder of the unforeseen consequences of actions taken in the pursuit of security. The ethical dilemmas and moral quandaries faced by the characters underscore the complexity of security decisions, which often involve trade-offs between immediate gains and long-term stability. This complexity necessitates a comprehensive approach to global security, one that integrates the insights of realism and neorealism with ethical considerations and a commitment to sustainable peace.

Conclusion

Liu Cixin’s “The Three-Body Problem”, through the lens of realism and neorealism, unfolds as a grand narrative of survival, power, and strategic maneuvering, transcending the confines of Earth to encompass the cosmic stage. The application of these theories to the interstellar conflict between humanity and the Trisolarans, as well as the geopolitical tensions among Earth’s nations, offers profound insights into the enduring relevance of realism and neorealism in understanding the dynamics of power and security. The application of international relations theories to Liu Cixin’s novel enhances our appreciation of its narrative complexities and illuminates key aspects of global security. The interplay between survival, power, and cooperation in the novel mirrors the challenges and opportunities faced by the international community in ensuring collective security. As we navigate the uncertainties of the 21st century, the lessons drawn from “The Three-Body Problem” and the theoretical frameworks of realism and neorealism offer valuable guidance in the pursuit of a more stable and secure world.

References

Morgenthau, Hans J. “Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace.” New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948.

Waltz, Kenneth N. “Theory of International Politics.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is what States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46, no. 2 (Spring 1992): 391-425.

Images created with OpenAI DALL·E 3.